Physicochemical Characterization of a Co-Processed Excipient (Gelactomucin) With Cellactose and Alpha-Anhydrous Lactose
Barre latérale de l'article
Contenu principal de l'article
Résumé
Excipients in recent times have been conferred with improved functionalities through chemical, physical modification and co-processing. This study was aimed at preparing Gelactomucin, a co-processed excipient using co-fusion method, and evaluating its physico-chemical properties comparatively with Cellactose – 80 and Alpha-anhydrous lactose. The parameters investigated were swelling capacity, loss on drying, moisture content, bulk and tapped densities, angle of repose and true density. The results obtained for the co-processed excipient were swelling capacity 104 %, loss on drying 1.7% and angle of repose 250. Cellactose-80 recorded 128 %, 1.4 %, 19 O for swelling capacity, loss on drying and angle of repose respectively. The comparison showed that Gelactomucin could compete favourably with the reference excipients.
Téléchargements
Renseignements sur l'article
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
Références
Adeoye, O. and Alebiowu, G. (2014). Flow, packing and compaction properties of novel coprocessed multifunctional directly compressible excipients prepared from tapioca starch and Mannitol. Pharm Dev. Technol. 19(8): 901 – 910.
Armstrong, N.A and Palfrey, L. P (1989). The effect of machine speed on consolidation of four directly compressible tablet diluents. J Pharm Pharmacol, 41:149-151.
Armstrong, N.A., Roscheisen, G. and Al-Aghbar, M.R. (1996). Cellactose as a Tablet Diluent. Manuf. Chem., 67:25 26.
Casalderrey, M., Sonto, C. and Conheiro, A. (2004). A Comparison of Drug Loading Capacity of Cellactose with two ad hoc Processed Lactose-Cellulose direct compression excipients. Chem Pharm Bull; 52(4): 398 – 401.
Dare, K., Akin-Ajani, D.O., Odeku, O.A., Odusote, O.M. and Itiola, O.A. (2008). Effects of Pigeon pea and plantain starches on the compressional, mechanical and disintegration properties of paracetamol tablets. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 32 (3): 357-365
Emeje, M. Ihimekpen, O. Isimi, C. Sabinos, O. and Kunle, O. (2009). Isolation Characterization and Compaction Properties of Afzelia Africana gum excudates in Hydrochlorothiazide tablet formulations. African J. of Pharm. And Pharmacology, Vol. 3(5). pp. 265 – 272.
Flores, L.E., Arellano, R.L. and Esquirel, J.J.D. (2000). Study of Load Capacity of Avicel PH-200 and Cellactose, Two Direct-Compression Excipients Using Experimental Design. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 26(4): 465 – 466.
Garr, J.S. and Rubinstein, M.H. (1991). Compaction Properties of Cellulose Lactose Direct Compression Excipient. Pharm. Tech. Int; 3:24-27.
Gohel, M.C., Parikh, R.K., Brahmbhatt, B.K. and Shah, A.R. (2007). Improving the Tablet Charcateristics and Dissolution Profile of Ibuprofen by using a Novel Coprocessed Superdisintegrant: A Technical Note. AAPS Pham. Sci. Tech. 8(1): E1-6.
Krycer, I., Pope, D.G. and Hersey, J.A. (1982). The Role Intragranular Porosity in Powder compaction. Powder Technol., 33:101-111.
Luiz, A. George, G., Pedro, P. and Peter, C (2005). Dry Granulation and Compression of Spray-Dried Plant Extracts. AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech. 6(3) article 45.
Mohammed, B.B., Isah, A.B. and Ibrahim, M.A. (2009). Influence of Compaction Pressures on Modified Cassava Starch As a binder in Paracetamol Tablet formulations. Nig. Journ. Pharm. Sci. Vol. 8(1): 80 – 88.
Momoh, M.A, Adikwu, M.U and Ugwu, A.A (2012). Insulin-Loaded Mucin-Eudragit Complexation: A Rectal Delivery Approach. Journal of Pharmacy Research, 5(4). 2052-2056
Mullarney M, Hancock B, Carlson G, Ladipo D and Langdon B (2003). The Powder flow and Compact Mechanical Properties ofSsucrose and three high-intensity sweeteners used in chewable tablets, International Journal of Pharmaceutics; 257: 227 – 236.
Nachaegari, S.K. and Bansal, A.K. (2004). Coprocessed Excipients for Solid Dosage form. Pharm. Technol; 28: 52 – 65.
Ogunjimi, A.T. and Alebiowu, G (2013). Flow and Consolidation Properties Of neem gum coprocessed with two pharmaceutical excipients. Powder Technology, 246: 187-192
Ohwoavworhua, F.O. and Adelakun, T.A. (2005). Some Physical Characteristics of Microcrystalline Cellulose obtained from Raw Cotton of Cochlospermum Planchonii. Tropical Journal of Pharm. Res. 4:1-7.
Sameh, A., Firas, A. and Gabriele, B. (2011). Investigating the Effects of Particle Size and Shape on High Speed Tableting through Radial Die-wall Pressure Monitoring. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 413: 29 – 35.
Sonnergard, J.M. (1999). “A Critical Evaluation of the Heckel Equation” Int. J. Pharm. 193: 63-71.
Staniforth, J.N. and Aulton, M.E. (2007). Powder flow. In: Aulton ME, ed. Pharmaceutics the design and manufacture of medicines. 3rd ed. New York: Elsevier; 168 – 178.
Thalberg, K. Lindholm, D. and Axelsson, A. (2006). Comparison of Different Flowability Tests for Powder for Inhalation. Powder Technology, 146: 206 – 213.
USP/NF, (2005). United State Pharmacopeia: National Formulary. ISBN 13: 978 - 18897788258
Zhou, Q., Armstrong, B. and Laarson, I. (2010). Improving Powder flow properties of a cohesive lactose monohydrate powder by intensive mechanical dry coating. J. Pharm. Sci; 99:969 – 981.